Case Study

Project Management of Design History File Integration via Acquisition

Service

DateS

-

INDUSTRY

Medical Devices
< Back to Insights

Background

A Fortune 500 medical device manufacturer acquired another medical device company to grow their Urology business unit from a $500 million to a $1 billion organization. ECI was commissioned to manage and conduct a deep dive assessment and subsequent remediation of the Design History Files (DHF) of the acquired products. The objective of the engagement was to assess the quality of the DHFs of the acquired products to determine the best remediation pathway into the client's Quality Management System (QMS).

The focus areas were:

  • US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Code of Federal Regulations, 21 CFR 820.30
  • ISO 13485:2016 Section 7.3
  • ISO 14971
  • Device specific standards

Approach and Solution

ECI engaged a project manager to work with the client to determine an appropriate strategy for the successful integration of the acquired products. This was achieved using a PMBOK® based approach.

Comprehensive Action

Initiation

The initial step defined the project charter. By working with the required partners, the project manager successfully defined the purpose and objectives of the project. The overall project risks were defined, and a high-level schedule of milestones prepared. The project manager helped define the resources required from within the client company, the acquired company and ECI.

Planning

An input to the planning phase was the completed design history file assessments. Sixteen discrete products were assessed which included capital equipment, reusable and single use devices. These products were categorized into a priority order based on the client's overall business portfolio need.

ECI engaged a team to review the legacy data associated with these products and identified wide ranging DHF non-conformances, such as:

  • Missing test method validations
  • Non verifiable design inputs with no source
  • Missing real time shelf-life data
  • Gaps to current usability and risk management standards
  • Missing training records, build records, calibration records
  • Design verification data exists but original data source missing
  • Lack of robust or valid statistical rationales

Based on the assessment results, the project scope and subsequent project plan was developed.

Execution

The project manager successfully managed the activities of multiple functions, such as R&D engineers, design assurance engineers, regulatory affairs specialists and coordinated material handling from the various manufacturing sites through sterilization and to various test locations. Updates were provided on a bi-weekly basis to the steering committee and key stakeholders vested in the successful execution of the project.

The conclusion of the assessment was that 12 product families would require remediation to be consistent with the client's quality expectations. The remaining families went to end of life and closed out per the client's QMS requirements.

Before remediation was initiated, ECI developed a site level SOP to create a remediation pathway for the product families. This allowed our client to prioritize the appropriate elements for remediation. Additionally, a Quality Plan was developed per product so that the remediation pathway could be reviewed and agreed upon by quality management.

For each product family, ECI completed a post market assessment of the device to ensure that the device could remain on the market while the remediation activities were being completed.

Remediation activities consisted of:

  • Design Inputs - remediation of user needs and design requirements. This included restating requirements in verifiable terms and ensuring device specific standards were addressed.
  • Design Outputs - drawings were remediated to identify essential design outputs and include the clients drawing standard requirements.
  • Design Verification - design verification was conducted to address the gaps. This included the completion of test method development and validation as needed. Risk based statistical sampling was used and statistical analysis to analyze data. In addition, real-time aging studies were initiated for all product families.
  • Design Validation - design validation was satisfied using a combination of clinical literature and test activity.
  • Risk Management - risk documentation was updated to comply with ISO 14971.

Monitoring

The project was consistently monitored for progress to plan, scope creep and risk. When scope creep occurred, the issues were reviewed to determine if they should be included or handed off to other project teams. The ongoing use of the risk register allowed for the prioritization of activities and developing mitigations.

Closure

Upon completion of the activities associated with each product family, the project manager facilitated a "Sustaining Transfer Meeting" to ensure that the client sustaining engineering team had the full history of activity conducted. This also ensured that the project success criteria as defined in the project charter was met.

This undertaking was completed over a 24-month period and the activities completed by the ECI team included:

  • # of Product Families Remediated = 12
  • # of Document Change Orders Completed ~ 1250
  • # of Documents Updated ~ 2500
  • # of Specifications Updated or Clarified ~ 740
  • # of Test Method Validations Completed ~ 240
  • # of Units Tested ~ 4800

Results

ECI successfully managed the remediation of 12 product families into the client's QMS and documentation management system using a methodical PMBOK® approach.

Download White Paper

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

We're Here to Help

When you engage ECI, you can focus on your business. Let us focus on the momentum of the industry and help you keep pace across your portfolio.

Contact US